Sweden consistently outperforms Canada on universal health care despite similar spending: new study - National Post
Sweden and Canada operate publicly financed universal health-care systems, but access for Swedes is significantly better, according to a new report from the Fraser Institute. Photo by Derek Baldwin/Getty ImagesArticle contentSweden and Canada operate publicly financed universal health-care systems, but access to care in the Nordic country is “markedly better,” according to a new report from the Fraser Institute.
In 2024, wait times leading to unmet medical needs affected two per cent of Swedes, compared with 9.1 per cent of Canadians, says the report’s author, Yanick Labrie.
The study argues that the difference between the two national systems can be found in the way they are organized. Labrie states that almost half (46.9 per cent) of primary care centres in Sweden are privately operated, while still fully funded by public dollars.
Labrie notes that private providers in Sweden perform more than 40 per cent of publicly funded hip and knee replacements and over 70 per cent of cataract procedures.
Get a dash of perspective along with the trending news of the day in a very readable format.
A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of NP Posted will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
Private providers have also expanded surgical capacity, rather than displacing it, he suggests. Between 2001 and 2019, the share of cataract patients treated within 90 days increased from 36.9 to 88.2 per cent while median waiting times fell from 6.2 to 1.8 months.
More particularly, 85 per cent of patients receive a medical assessment within three days when needed, the study states.
Labrie states that European health-care systems have attracted an increasing level attention among Canadian policymakers. For example, he states that in May 2026, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith led a delegation to Sweden to learn more about the country’s approach to organizing and delivering health care within a universal system.
Labrie notes that similar to Canada, Sweden’s health-care system is founded on the principle that access to medically necessary care should depend on need rather than ability to pay. But discussions of health-care reform in Canada often become highly polarized when it comes to expanding the role of private providers, says Labrie.
“As a result, health-care policy discussions in Canada often focus primarily on preserving existing financing arrangements rather than examining alternative models for organizing and delivering care to Canadians.”
