How the Supreme Court shaped due process in death penalty cases

You don’t have any Active Subscription.

Account subscription benefits alongside Premium Stories, Editorials, Opinions and more. Unlock these with Subscription

The Day Against the Death Penalty offered a fitting moment to look back at how the top court’s safeguards, laid down when it upheld capital punishment, have fared over the past four decades. | Photo Credit: Getty Images/iStockphoto

The Day Against the Death Penalty, observed on October 10, offered a fitting moment to look back on how the Supreme Court’s 1980 safeguards, laid down when it upheld capital punishment, have fared over the past four decades.

In Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab (1980), the Constitution Bench upheld the death penalty, but imposed specific conditions in the shape of guidelines for the exercise of judicial discretion. Following the legislative scheme of Section 354(3) of the CrPC, now Section 393(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, life imprisonment was to be the norm, and death sentence could be imposed only for “special reasons”. Courts were to weigh the circumstances of the crime alongside those of the accused, and impose death only where life imprisonment was “unquestionably foreclosed”.

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.