Caste Hindu candidate claims reservation through bogus community certificate, Madras High Court refuses to order release of terminal benefits

Direct Source Verification: This story is aggregated from The Hindu (thehindu.com). Full reporting rights and copyright belong to the primary publisher.
Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy refuses to direct Chennai Port Trust to pay full pension and disburse other terminal benefits to the employee who had attained the age of superannuation after 32 years of service

You don’t have any Active Subscription.

Account subscription benefits alongside Premium Stories, Editorials, Opinions and more. Unlock these with Subscription

The Madras High Court has found that a Caste Hindu had joined the Chennai Port Trust (CPT) in 1982 in a post reserved for a Scheduled Tribe (ST) candidate, served the organisation for 32 years by prolonging the inquiry into his caste status and attained the age of superannuation in 2013 thereby depriving an unknown person, suffering social stigma, of the constitutional benevolence shown by the nation.

Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy dismissed a couple of writ petitions filed by A. Jegannathan and refused to interfere with the State Level Scrutiny Committee’s (SLSC) conclusion that the petitioner actually belonged to Urali Gounder community and not the Urali tribe. The judge refused to direct CPT to pay full pension or release other terminal benefits such as gratuity, leave salary and so on.

He pointed out that a community certificate produced by the petitioner, to claim the benefit of reservation, was referred to the Salem Collector for verification by the CPT way back in 1983 itself. On verification, the revenue officials found that the petitioner had actually studied in Tiruchi district and had been identified as belonging to Urali Gounder community in his school records.

Therefore, in 1984, the Salem Collector informed the CPT that the community certificate was not genuine and that the writ petitioner had failed to prove his tribal status despite having been accorded an opportunity to do so. Aggrieved over it, Mr. Jegannathan filed a writ petition in 1985 and got the Collector’s order quashed in 1986. Then, the High Court also ordered a fesh inquiry.

Accordingly, a fresh inquiry was initiated in 1986 and was concluded in 1990 confirming that the petitioner was a Caste Hindu and not a Scheduled Tribe. He was also discharged from ther services of CPT on September 26, 1990. However, the petitioner filed another writ petition and obtained an interim stay of the discharge order. The High Court once again ordered a re-inquiry into his caste status.

Thereafter, the inquiry got prolonged due to it being shuttled between the SLSC and the District Level Scrutiny Committee and the delay led to his attaining the age of superannuation. It was only in 2021 that the SLSC concluded that the petitioner had produced a bogus community certificate obtained fraudulently with the mala fide intention to derive constitutional benefits meant for a genuine scheduled tribe.

Hence, the petitioner had approached the High Court with the present writ petitions urging it to quash the SLSC’s conclusion since it was passed without hearing him and also to direct CPT to pay him full pension and other terminal benefits. However, on persual of records, the judge found that the SLSC had arrived at the conclusion on the basis of documentary evidence since the petitioner failed to appear for inquiry.

The SLSC had found that the petitioner’s brother, paternal uncles and cousins had given statements that they were not part of any scheduled tribe. The Village Administrative Officer too had confirmed that the petitioner did not belong to the Urali tribe. Since there was overwhelming evidence against the petitioner, the SLSC’s order could not be interfered with on sole ground of violation of principles of natural justice, the judge concluded.

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.

Original Source
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/caste-hindu-candidate-claims-reservation-through-bogus-community-certificate-madras-high-court-refuses-to-order-release-of-terminal-benefits/article71484580.ece
Visit The Hindu β†—
SHARE STORY:
𝕏 f in

Related Coverage in Business