After bipartisan criticism, Trump says taxpayers dollars will no longer be used for TV ads promoting him

President Donald Trump backed down in the face of bipartisan criticism over funding for the ads.Tom Williams / CQ-Roll Call via GettyShareAdd NBC News to GoogleOct. 5, 2026, 8:42 PM EDTBy Raquel Coronell UribeIn a major reversal, President Donald Trump said Monday that he and his super PAC will now pay for campaign-style ads that promote his administration, instead of using federal funds.

Trump made the announcement on Truth Social after intense criticism from lawmakers on both sides of the aisle, some of whom questioned the legality of using taxpayer dollars for pro-Trump ads.

“The Radical Left is upset with the fact that I am taking Ads, which I consider to be a positive promotion for our Great U.S.A., and paying for them with U.S.A. money,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “This is a rather standard thing to do but, rather than doing that, although nothing will make them happy, I have decided to do the Patriotic Ads, among others, and pay for them myself, and with money I raised for MAGA, Inc.”

Trump’s super PAC, MAGA Inc., did not immediately respond to an inquiry about whether Trump and it would reimburse the government for the ads that have already aired. The White House did not answer that question, either.

“MAGA Inc. will pay for the PSA ads moving forward,” a White House official said.

“Presidential Public service announcements are nothing new. Administrations of both parties have used public service announcements to explain policy and make the case for the nation’s direction,” the official added.

AdImpact, a political ad-tracking firm, estimated the government has spent at least $10 million to air the ads.

The ads, which portray Trump in a favorable light, included disclaimers saying they were paid for by the U.S. government. One of the spots was virtually identical to a 2024 Trump campaign ad.

FOR SUBSCRIBERSTexts show worried Cornell fraternity brothers coordinating responses as accusations came to lightFOR SUBSCRIBERSTips came in just minutes after Cornell alerted students to an alleged sex assault at a frat houseFOR SUBSCRIBERSWhat’s on the Supreme Court’s docket this term?FOR SUBSCRIBERSFord CEO: ‘It’s our responsibility’ to make sure affordable cars are sold in the U.S.FOR SUBSCRIBERSDOJ moves to revoke U.S. citizenship for 40 foreign-born AmericansFOR SUBSCRIBERSThe U.S., Denmark and Greenland reached a security deal. Here’s what to know.FOR SUBSCRIBERSFamily of Epstein victim appears in campaign attack ad in ColoradoFOR SUBSCRIBERS‘Things the average pilot avoids’: Why NASA has been sending planes into ‘fire clouds’FOR SUBSCRIBERSSusan Collins and Troy Jackson brace for debate gantlet in close, pivotal Maine Senate raceFOR SUBSCRIBERSIs ‘bad’ cholesterol actually good? Cardiologists set the record straightFOR SUBSCRIBERSIn early clinical trial, people with Type 1 diabetes are able to go off insulinFOR SUBSCRIBERS‘Daddy, we don’t want to die’: Daughters’ words pushed Flydubai passenger to confront attackerFOR SUBSCRIBERSPoll: The Latino vote isn’t a monolith. Here’s how it breaks down by gender, generation and more.FOR SUBSCRIBERSWhy 7 million fewer working women get paid time off than menFOR SUBSCRIBERSTaiwan reckons with the prospect of fending for itself as Trump pivots on ChinaFor SubscribersFOR SUBSCRIBERSTexts show worried Cornell fraternity brothers coordinating responses as accusations came to lightFOR SUBSCRIBERSTips came in just minutes after Cornell alerted students to an alleged sex assault at a frat houseFOR SUBSCRIBERSWhat’s on the Supreme Court’s docket this term?FOR SUBSCRIBERSFord CEO: ‘It’s our responsibility’ to make sure affordable cars are sold in the U.S.FOR SUBSCRIBERSDOJ moves to revoke U.S. citizenship for 40 foreign-born AmericansFOR SUBSCRIBERSThe U.S., Denmark and Greenland reached a security deal. Here’s what to know.FOR SUBSCRIBERSFamily of Epstein victim appears in campaign attack ad in ColoradoFOR SUBSCRIBERS‘Things the average pilot avoids’: Why NASA has been sending planes into ‘fire clouds’FOR SUBSCRIBERSSusan Collins and Troy Jackson brace for debate gantlet in close, pivotal Maine Senate raceFOR SUBSCRIBERSIs ‘bad’ cholesterol actually good? Cardiologists set the record straightFOR SUBSCRIBERSIn early clinical trial, people with Type 1 diabetes are able to go off insulinFOR SUBSCRIBERS‘Daddy, we don’t want to die’: Daughters’ words pushed Flydubai passenger to confront attackerFOR SUBSCRIBERSPoll: The Latino vote isn’t a monolith. Here’s how it breaks down by gender, generation and more.FOR SUBSCRIBERSWhy 7 million fewer working women get paid time off than menFOR SUBSCRIBERSTaiwan reckons with the prospect of fending for itself as Trump pivots on ChinaNBC News reported last week that the ads were paid for by money intended for U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

A Maryland-based firm, LMD Agency, was awarded a $20 million contract for the new ads, according to public contracting records. The purpose of the contract was listed as a “national media campaign.”

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have condemned the ads. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., called it “propaganda,” while Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., who is retiring, likened Trump to former Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán.

“There’s no place for that sort of thing,” Tillis said.

The White House previously defended the ads, calling them “clearly not political” and saying the PSAs were “about reminding Americans to love their country and understand what makes it worth defending, at home, at our borders, and abroad.”

Raquel Coronell UribeRaquel Coronell Uribe is a politics reporter for NBC News.